I shifted modules-all into advanced-editing ( it, fr, en, de)

Now I have to copy all the french stuff into eng. and german….

EDIT: I wonder , why you do not have parented the lowest level ( like "minirecentpost" a.s.o.) to the higher forum, but used the soft catregory "relative by functions" ( using backlinks).
on one hand. This does not result in a complete" site map , but on other hand it does not overfill the site map…

Berbuz wrote in another language thread¹

Çok teşekkür ederilm Helmut, ..Ooooh sorry Helmut… thank you very much for your support guru.. I’d like to find a way to make some advert in order to find contributors because it’s a huge task for a lonesome cowboy like me. Do you have any idea?

Regards,

My question - what is your opinion?

( i can not really remember if we had such discussions before? )

Bu bölüm, Türkçeye çevrilmekte olan WikiDOT el kitabı hakkındaki soru, eleştiri, teklif ve cevaplarınızı barındırmak üzere kurulmuştur. Sorularınıza cevabı bilen herhangi bir site uyesi cevap verebilir. Katılımınız çok makbule geçecek ve yardımınız bu siteyi zenginleştirmekle ile birlikte Tükiyede wiki teknollojisinin daha iyi ve yaygın bir şekilde kullanılmasına yol açacağına inanıyoruz.

Size tekrar hoş geldiniz diyoruym.
BerBuz

Pourrais-tu jeter un œil sur la page du glossaire français stp, je la trouve un peu bizarre, il y un lien nommé Gaeilge qui, je pense, n’a rien à faire là.
Je n’ose pas la nettoyer, ne sachant si c’est le haut (franchement pas génial) ou le bas qui est à virer.
Merci pour ta réponse avisée.

Cordialement
Bernard

I was translating the introduction to divs which is supposed to be an “advances” subject. It seems very “light” to me, I add some details on inline arguments to justify the “advanced” option. You can see it here.

Inline styling appears in some tags used by WikiDOT (divs, tables, span, images etc.) I think that it would be nice to have an “Inline CSS” or “Inline Style” page to describe the most common inline arguments and relevant structure. CSS2 is quiet cumbersome to a new comer. Sending them to the 3W pages is not necessary and won’t solve their problem; the target of the page would only be to give some details on CSS elements commonly used in wikidot.

Although there is a page project named “CSS – Themes” I suppose that it will be more “theme oriented” and contain too many elements. A separate “Inline Style” would be easier to understand. The pages dedicated to elements using inline styles divs, tables, span, images etc.) could link this page.

I’d be glad to have your opinion about that. If you agree, I can create the French page but my English is not good enough for the En: version.

Regards to all.
Bernard.

1.The link contained in following line leads to a non existing page.

These are pre - prepared pages, pro - formers, or forms that you may wish your wikidot contributers to use.
An excellent example can be found here.

As the visitor is not authorised to crate page on that site he has no chance to see the supposed templates. If the purpose is to show a site using “template” mechanism without showing the templates itself, then it would be better to link to the home page of the site.

2.The example given here is not accurate

For example:
Have a look at at the side bar to your left. Right at the top it says "nav:side-en"
This is the actual page name of that particular side bar.
Now have a look : Here
Notice at the top, it says "nav:side-de." This is the German category side bar

“Right at the top it says "nav:side-en"” This is not true, nothing is written there !
Notice at the top, it says "nav:side-de." This is not true, nothing is written there also !
Maybe it was true in an older version of handbook but currently this sentences just confuses the users.
Regards,

Mon avis : Le logo Wiki ajoute une touche de couleur agréable aux pages, ça serait bien de le généraliser, Le titre « Contenu du manuel » n’apporte pas grand-chose à part repousser des infos utiles vers le bas de la page, je ne suis pas pour sa conservation.

J’ai aussi remarqué que la taille de la fonte utilisée dans le même menu allemand et plus petite, je présume cela est du au fait qui il faille des mots plus long en allemand et pour éviter les ruptures de ligne.

Autre remarque sur la barre de gauche : Pourquoi pensez vous qu’il faille préciser (en) ou (fr) à coté de Welcome ou Accueil etc. il me semble que ça tombe sous le sens. Si dans le même menu il y avait une autre rubrique qui dirigeait vers un « welcome autre » ça aurait un sens de le préciser mais ce n’est pas le cas.

Amitiés.

I changed the glossary structure on the handbook accourdingly to the community ( thanks to the INCLUDE KING !)

There are the OLD include:language used for the de:start-glossary , but a new for the detail pages : "de-glossary:xyz ",

and the right-column is amended to contain the correct language for the start-glossary, but the correct type for the language driven item.

Could be there are some page tags (system2) missing, but I do not believe…

Please have a look!

I changed the german Handbook to the new content layout with sections ( german Kapitel) .

Hope this helps in the future.

he found the (open) wiki syntax page in wikitod.org and aded thuis text size paragraph.

http://www.wikidot.org/doc:wiki-syntax

I copied it into the existing different languages.

Achille started the discussion and preparation of the Site manager for the Handbook.

I inserted only one link in the Site for beginners section for it and created a new Site-manager page.

I am not sure if this is enough.

Achille made some screenshot for the translations of some "deeper" menu points of the Site manager.

But my question is : how deep should we go on this page ? Will it get too large with too many Images?

Should we start an extra section- page (the 10.) for the Site manager alone?
or only a link list to the different items on the different levels ?

And what to do with "not yet" written missing issues from this Site manager?

Have a look on the http://handbook.wikidot.com/en:site-creation-for-beginners

in the different languages - how Achille did it. - sometimes with screenshots.

What is your oppinion?

Best regards
Helmut

http://g-bassi.wikidot.com

http://allyrics.wikidot.com/mezmerize

http://aki54.wikidot.com/start

http://adi.wikidot.com/

http://achille.wikidot.com/

-
-
c'è ne sono altri?

Ogni suggerimento è benvenuto.
a.oliva

what do you think about :[http://handbook.wikidot.com/achille].

Any suggestion?

Where to put those pages in the index? where upload files and images and nav:side?

I konw that only admins can upload files and edit side frame.

Have both a good Epifany, my work is waiting me,:) I am a theacher.

Best Regards

achille

http://handbook.wikidot.com/en:wikidot-for-beginners-print

I have not yet build a link (or parent ) on the start page or the content page itself:

http://handbook.wikidot.com/en:wikidot-for-beginners

issues:

1. we cannot avoid the include include:languages in the included pages
2. we cannot stop any [[toc]] tag in one of the included pages to show ALL headings …

3. I tested the printout and inserted before every "+ headings" a page-break-after:always:

 [[div style="page-break-before:always"]] @@ @@ [[/div]] 

I am not sure how we can avoid the often include:language includes…
What is your opinion?
regards
Helmut

I have renamed your new page about Umlauten to
de:link-with-umlauten-aeoeue
i.e. I have

• added the category de: and
• englishised the page name while keeping the German page title to "Link Mit Umlauten äöü".

Best regards,
gerdami.

Any volunteer ?